Every tube, code, and draw order. One search.
Type the tests you’re ordering, pick your lab, and get the exact collection plan — tubes, volumes, lab codes, draw order, and storage — verified by a clinician. No tabs. No cheat sheets. No PHI.
You know what to order. The annoying part is collecting it right.
Insurance networks decide the lab — not the practice. One patient is covered for Quest, the next for LabCorp, the next for BioReference. Each keeps its own walled directory, so staff open tab after tab, lean on wall charts and memory, and find out about a rejection two days later — when the patient has to come back.
“I know what to order clinically. The annoying part is making sure we collect it exactly the way each lab wants it.”
Three steps. No login. No friction.
What a provider actually sees.
One panel, one lab, one consolidated answer — tubes, codes, draw order, and storage, every field sourced and dated.
Everything the draw station needs. Nothing it doesn’t.
The gap isn’t lab data. It’s neutral, cross-lab guidance.
Even a practice with a single-lab portal gets pulled across labs by insurance coverage — and that portal sits walled off from the EHR. Quest will never display LabCorp's codes. A neutral, multi-lab, multi-test workflow layer is something no single reference lab can build. That structural gap is the moat.
What rejected specimens really cost you.
The pitch isn’t “save time on lookups.” It’s stopping an unmonitored operational leak. Move the sliders to your practice.
Try it free. Cheaper per user as you grow.
Flat practice pricing — no per-seat billing, no user management. Every upgrade is a ceiling hit, never a sales call.